|
 |
| |
|
Another reason why The Daily Show is the best show on television: live responses (a half an hour after the debates end) -- "Squabble in Coral Gables." You know if the Daily Show endorses you, then you're in good shape.
Speaking of endorsements, check out this site: Dear Jon Stewart --
Dear Jon Stewart, We are writing to request that you endorse a candidate for President. For better or worse, you are a primary source of news for people of our generation. As one of the few people who will call politicians and public figures on their actions, you have earned the respect of a demographic fed up with being treated as consumers, rather than participants with a stake in their future. Whether or not you want it. Young Americans are the ones who will one day suffer the consequences of reckless policy or reap the benefits of progressive change. People our age are sent to fight, and too often, to die in Iraq. People our age find jobs the hardest to come by as we endure another recession. Our financial aid is cut so that the richest one percent of Americans can enjoy massive tax cuts. It is our generation that will inherit the debt that is exacerbated each year that we run record deficits. If there is a draft, it is our generation that will be drafted, fight, and die. A comedian may make a political endorsement without sacrificing objectivity. For many of us, The Daily Show was our first engagement with politics. Because of your program, more young Americans than ever are aware of the sad state of the country. It is our belief that an endorsement from you would further legitimize political participation in the eyes of our generation, and give us the confidence to stand up for our future. Young voters are conspicuously absent on Election Day because we feel ignored and shut out by the system. With politicians and journalists counting us out, we have the potential to be the X factor that decides the outcome of this election. Now is the time to engage the 40 million young Americans whose futures are at stake in this election. We urge you to stand with us. Sure, he's a comedian, but he's dead-on in his satirical analysis. Go sign on as one of the "undersigned Young Americans." You know I did.
|
|
|
|
|
Debates over -- interesting spectacle.
I'm especially curious to who the media will pin as the "winner." Of course, my very biased opinion is leaning toward Kerry -- I thought he had some serious accusations of the president and some clear visions of how he can rectify the situation we're in now.
The president, on the other hand, was interesting to watch stumble for words. I particularly liked it when he Freudian-slipped Saddam Hussein's name insteada Osama bin Laden. Genius!
Ultimately, these debates were completely different in tone and issues than they were four year's ago. You can either choose a president who centers his ENTIRE campaign on the issue of living in fear and thumbing your nose at the international community -- or -- choose a man who wants to mend the bridges the neo-cons so eagerly burned down and attempt to acheive some type of balance, despite the spinning deficit he'll inherit.
Not a hard choice, in this humble girl's opinion.
UPDATE: My favorite part of the debate --
KERRY: Secretary of State Colin Powell told this president the Pottery Barn rule: If you break it, you fix it. Now, if you break it, you made a mistake. It‘s the wrong thing to do. But you own it. And then you‘ve got to fix it and do something with it. Now that‘s what we have to do. There‘s no inconsistency. Soldiers know over there that this isn‘t being done right yet. I‘m going to get it right for those soldiers, because it‘s important to Israel, it‘s important to America, it‘s important to the world, it‘s important to the fight on terror. But I have a plan to do it. He doesn‘t.
Go Kerry Go.
|
|
|
|
|
T - 10 minutes to the debate.
Wonkette has a drinking game ready to go:
Drink One Sip If:
Anyone says "terrorism"
Anyone says "Halliburton"
Anyone says "flip flop"
Anyone says "Saddam Hussein"
Anyone blames "the media"
Anyone mentions their own military service
Anyone says "September 11"
One candidate interrupts another candidate Drink Two Sips If:
Bush says "cut and run"
Kerry says "W stands for wrong"
Either candidate talks past their time limit
Kerry brings up Bush's "Mission Accomplished" moment
Bush mentions Crawford, TX
Anyone looks at the wrong camera
Anyone whips out "evidence"
Anyone says "Osama bin Laden"
Anyone mentions blogs
Anyone invokes the hurricane sympathy vote
Anyone mentions "North Korea"
Kerry mentions Bush wants to reinstate the draft
Everytime you see anyone wearing the yellow "LiveSTRONG" bracelet Finish Your Glass If:
Anyone in the audience gets dragged out of the auditorium
Anyone in the audience gets off an unscripted question
Bush mispronounces any word or name
Anyone says "Osama bin Hidin'"
Anyone uses a sports metaphor
Anyone attempts to speak Spanish to pander to Latinos Do a Shot If:
Bush mentions the deficit
Bush accuses Kerry of being "French on terrorism"
Kerry accuses Bush of being a pansy for avoiding Vietnam
Bush admits he made a mistake ("miscalculation" counts)
Ralph Nader shows up insisting on airtime Finish the Bottle If:
Anyone challenges anyone to a duel
The moderator rips off his mask to reveal his true identity is Karl Rove
|
|
|
|
|
It snowed today. SNOW!
It's going to be a long winter, methinks.
|
|
|
|
|
Overheard on the Daily Show tonight:
Stewart (to reporter Ed Helms): What, you write your news reports the night before the actual event? What if real news breaks?
Helms: Jon, that's what bloggers are for!
Heh. Plus, tonight's bit about Bush being interviewed on Bill O'Reilly -- priceless.
Oh, by the way -- your computer screen is decidedly non-partisan. Go download some desktops or screensavers in celebration of Indecision 2004.
Don't forget, tomorrow night (9pm EST) is the first Presidential Debate. Here's hoping it won't be as disappointing as I think it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
Ordered two new book victims offa Amazon.ca today:
This one and this one -- both of which were highly recommended. The one thing that stinks about living here are the customs I usually have to pay. I've had to pay for gifts from my sister, a teeshirt ordered, and will probably have to pay some fee for these books. Ugh.
Bonfire tonight with J, W, & LT. Now my hair smells like campfire -- I love that.
Still have no real appetite, I'll take advantage of that while I can.
I'm not feeling as sick, which means I won't be able to use this excuse for non-thesis-writing much longer.
Speaking of which, I'm locking myself in this office for the next 2 hours to get some work done.
|
|
|
|
|
I got up long enough to go to a class this morning, sign for my student loan, and then drive back home. Now I'm back in bed, exhausted. No fun being sick. I'll settle in for a bit of a nap, and will hopefully knock out some thesis work in the afternoon/evening. I'm supposed to be turning in a draft of my literature review on Friday -- and there's just not much there. It's a bit daunting, trying to compress 2500+ years of rhetoric into a couple of pages ... but I shall overcome.
In other news, it looks like someone from my old youth group back home has stumbled across my page (hi Alison!). Interesting. I wonder who else haunts these pages from my past lives? It sort of adds a whole other layer to what I say on here, when I think of what old friends, current students, past loves, and present enemies lurk around to read what I have to say.
It's not that I have anything to hide, but the curious side of me would still like to know who you are. So -- out yourselves, already! Or send me an email. I'm interested in knowing what you're up to.
|
|
|
|
|
Q: My church is embarking on something called "40 Days of Purpose". Can you explain what this is?
A: Sure! The popular "40 Days of Purpose"® discipleship effort originated with Saddleback Church® in Lake Forest, California. The program leads participants through forty daily studies to help them discover God's will® for their lives. The 40® Days of Purpose® campaign is based on the popular book, The Purpose®-Driven Life® by Rick Warren®, pastor of Saddleback® Church®. That book, a sequel to Warren's® earlier best-seller, The Purpose®-Driven® Church®, examines the gospel® message at its most fundamental level, bringing participants® closer to Jesus® and to their life's purpose®. Indeed, Warren's® entire line of Purpose®-Driven® products® are used globally, even by churches® not affiliated with Saddleback®.
Warren's® website® puts it best: "The 40® Days® of Purpose® campaign helps Christians® new and old find their purpose® in life®, for the glory of God®."
Enjoy your journey® through the 40® Days® of Purpose® campaign®!
(via)
|
|
|
|
|
The other day (after watching Garden State for the second time), I was walking downtown with a friend of mine.
I was relating to him why I liked this movie so much -- how I could really relate to the protagonist's angst when it came to defining himself and what his future holds in store. I was rambling on about how typical it is for people our age to feel so lost and confused whenever we look into our future. I think that part of my rantings were a personal lament in my endless search to "find myself" -- and my doubts that it will ever happen.
Then the question came up of why this is such a common phenomenon for people our age -- which was when he said something that really struck me.
The reason why some people no longer appear to be in that angsty/unsure/anxious state is not because they have discovered the ultimate position and destination in their life -- it's just that they have given up trying.
That sounds like such a simple statement, but I really think there's some truth to it. Our world today is so wrapped up in having "the answers" that we're often afraid to stay in the asking questions mode. I mean, haven't you wished to have the formula or solution to all problems in your life?
Which brings me back to where I am, now. So much ahead of me is uncertain. I've got all sorts of questions about my destiny, along with many fears. But instead of lamenting the fact that I have all these questions, I want to embrace them and see where they lead me. Life isn't a multiple choice exam, it's one full of long and short answers.
And the same thing applies to my spirituality. Before, my faith fit into a nice, enclosed box. I could showcase it, and also put it aside whenever it wasn't convenient for me to act. I don't want that type of faith anymore. Right now, I'm all over the place -- I'm asking hard questions, looking for answers in a variety of places, and feel pretty lost at times. That said, I don't think I'd want it any other way. Now my faith is something that is real, something that isn't for show or for a mere get-outta-hell-free card.
Nowadays when people ask me questions about it, I don't have the "Sunday school answer" to give them. I don't think this is a bad thing. I just hope that I won't get back to the point where I'm on cruise control, circling which answer out of four apply in my life.
(not so bad, waxing philosophical despite the fact I can hardly move outta my bed!)
|
|
|
|
|
Return of the King is going to be 50 minutes longer in its extended release!!!
If I wasn't feeling so crappy, I'd be doing a happy dance. Click the link above if you wanna find out what extra scenes will be in the movie -- and you won't be disappointed!
More epic Aragorn in my life, please.
|
|
|
|
| [Boo-yah, Bill O'Reilly!] |
Comedy Central Refutes O'Reilly's Claim:
NEW YORK - The folks at Comedy Central were annoyed when Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly kept referring to "The Daily Show" audience as "stoned slackers." So they did a little research. And guess whose audience is more educated?
Viewers of Jon Stewart's show are more likely to have completed four years of college than people who watch "The O'Reilly Factor," according to Nielsen Media Research.
O'Reilly's teasing came when Stewart appeared on his show earlier this month.
"You know what's really frightening?" O'Reilly said. "You actually have an influence on this presidential election. That is scary, but it's true. You've got stoned slackers watching your dopey show every night and they can vote."
Comedy Central executives realized, and O'Reilly acknowledged, that he was poking fun. But they said they didn't want a misconception to persist.
"If the head of General Motors was watching O'Reilly's show, that could be very important to us," said Doug Herzog, Comedy Central president.
"If you listen to O'Reilly, you get the sense that it was crazy longhairs behind the show," he said. "And it's not. It's great, smart television that attracts a well-compensated audience, most of whom are voting age."
Relax, said Fox News Channel spokesman Rob Zimmerman.
"Comedy Central must have lost their sense of humor," Zimmerman said. "Without Jon Stewart, Comedy Central would turn into the Great American Country Channel."
Comedy Central also touted a recent study by the University of Pennsylvania's National Annenberg Election Survey, which said young viewers of "The Daily Show" were more likely to answer questions about politics correctly than those who don't.
I *heart* you, Jon Stewart!
What? Fans of the O'reilly factor are dumb? Who knew? Heh, I could have told you that with my own personal research and knowing a couple people who like this guy.
|
|
|
|
|
I may make it after all, physically wise. And am I extra sick in the head for thinking this flu may cause me to lose some weight? Probably.
Anyway, for those of you in Saskatoon & surrounding areas, Marc is selling his car of the kick-ass stereo and drive fast-ery.
He's not asking all that much for it, and it's a pretty sweet ride. Go check it out and tell your friends I sent ya. (maybe I'll get that commission after all!)
|
|
|
|
|
Saskatchewan in Autumn
Originally uploaded by renaissance grrrl. Ang put up some amazing fall pictures up on her flickr account -- if you want to see how beautiful it really is up here, go check them out!
|
|
|
|
| What lipstick would Jesus wear? |
Part Bible, part ‘zine – The Bible meets Oprah with a twist of InStyle! Becoming is the complete New Testament using the New Century Version, but it wouldn’t be a culture ‘zine if it didn’t address men, beauty, fitness and food! Today I braved the crowds at the local Christian big-box store (or what some friends of mine lovingly call the "Christian ghetto") in order to take a peek at Thomas Nelson's latest venture, Becoming.
This product is supposedly aimed for women my age (20s-30s), and it's following the same line its little sister "biblezine" follows in terms of its watering down of Scripture and its reinforcing of conservative, fundamentalist values.
Argh!
From my quick ten-minute perusal, here are my impressions -- lots of statements about the man being the "spiritual leader" in the relationship, a couple notes on the positive side of submitting, various side comments degrading feminist values, and of course the influx of trivial beauty tips and various "people of influence" to pray for.
Granted, I only could stomach reading its pages for 10 minutes, but it looks to be a Revolve fast-forward for Generation-X.
Here are some aspects of Becoming I found online:
- From this review: Wrapping the New Testament in a cutting-edge women's magazine format, this can't-put-down "Biblezine" brims with practical tips for bringing your "faith thing" into everything . . . BECOMING resembles a magazine, so those women who might feel uncomfortable reading a Bible in public might feel more comfortable reading BECOMING.
Hmm, it seems to me if you're uncomfortable reading a Bible in public, the last thing your faith needs is an easy cover-up magazine to masque your insecurities. More pointedly, critics say the biblezines oversimplify issues in a way that is both dangerous and misogynistic. A prime example is the topic of rape. One article in the magazine gives kudos to the Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network as being the largest anti-sexual assault organization and for being named one of America's best charities. But in what some consider a failing to offer readers a direct connection to the services of the organization, the article does not include the network's hotline number. More worrisome to some is "Abby's Story," which offers readers the testimony of a female rape survivor, who learns to forgive--and presumably not prosecute--her assailant. "I realized my rapist had continued to live and enjoy his life, while I was paralyzed by depression. I fell to my knees and begged Jesus to help me. I was reminded of the many times in the Bible we are told to forgive others." Sure, I'm all about eventually forgiving -- but I'm also about pressing charges against the bastard.
So there you have it. Christianity at its glossy, airbrushed finest. Now available at a store near you!
|
|
|
|
|
This is getting to be insane.
Ever since moving up here two years ago, I've struggled with insomnia. Usually it's worse for me during the late spring/summer seasons -- mainly because the sun doesn't officially set til almost 11pm and rises again around 3am.
But lately within the last month (ironically, since school started back), I've had even worse sleeping problems. Gone are the days when I could sleep until I woke up (after 10am, usually) -- and now I'm up and at 'em at 8am or earlier most days of the week. Theoretically, my schedule is not as fluid -- which you'd think would be helping my sleep instead of hindering it.
Yet despite being exhausted whenever I do get to bed, I just cannot sleep. Even if my body manages to clinically be asleep, I still wake up in the morning feeling just as tired as I was when I first went to bed due to my tossing and turning all night. I'm exercising, not drinking that much caffeine after lunchtime, cutting out naptimes, and I definitely feel tired -- but there's just no sleep for me.
Of course, I'm sure it doesn't help the my mind tends to go into overdrive the minute the world is quiet around me.
Sigh. Seriously, I'm on the verge of going to my doctor and having him prescribe me some knock-your-socks-off medication to put me out of my nocturnal misery. I was also thinking about acupuncture, just because I've heard it actually works -- and I have a friend who's licensed and could probably come over to my house to do it.
Any suggestions? I'm up for anything, at this point ... even if it means having a local come by my house with a rather large mallet.
|
|
|
|
|
I had my first Karaoke experience tonight! Luckily it was a very karaoke-friendly environment (and smoke-free!), I knew the cute deejay, and I had two very supportive grrrlfriends along. Oh, and not to mention two of these.
I did one fairly successful solo, "She's in Love with the Boy" by Trisha Yearwood -- a song with special sentimental attachments. Next time I am SO doing "These Boots are Made for Walking."
The traumatic experience of the night came with our duet rendition of "Big Yellow Taxi." Joni Mitchell, Saskatoon native, wherever you are -- I apologize! OH. my. goodness. Mitchell is not a high soprano, but this particular track was. At least I was humiliated with my good friend A by my side. Now we can cringe together about this experience when we're old and gray. Yikes.
That said, I'll go back and I'll drag Marc and Ang along with me. And if ever said-cute-deejay teases me about this experience, I can always rub in his face that one time that Hawksley Workman called me 'cute'.
ttfn
|
|
|
|
|
Such Great Heights
Iron & Wine
I am thinking it's a sign
That the freckles in our eyes
Are mirror images and
When we kiss they're perfectly aligned
And I have to speculate
That God himself did make us into
Corresponding shapes like puzzles pieces
From the clay
True, it may seem like a stretch
But it's thoughts like this
That catch my troubled head
When you're away, when I am missing you to death
When you were out there on the road
For several weeks of shows
And when you scan the radio
I hope this song will guide you home
They will see us waving from such great heights
"Come down now," they'll say
But everything looks perfect from far away
"Come down now," but we'll stay
I've tried my best to leave
This all on your machine
But the persistent beat
Sounded thin upon listening
That frankly will not fly
You will hear the shrillest highs
And lowest lows with the windows down
When this is guiding you home
They will see us waving from such great heights
"Come down now," they'll say
But everything looks perfect from far away
"Come down now," but we'll say... |
|
|
|
|
I'm spending the afternoon with the cutest guy in Saskatoon.
Okay, so he's only 4 years old -- but it's still nice to be adored and spend a warm fall day in the park.
|
|
|
|
|
I wish I could just freeze today in time.
It's warm, the trees around me are positively golden, and it's a sunshiney day outside. It's enough to make me feel poetic. The whole day I spent walking between buildings on campus, just noticing how the world around me feels infused with beauty.
I tried to capture some of it on my camera, but there's no amount of pixels that can replicate the simple beauties of an autumn day.
And tomorrow looks to be just as gorgeous as today -- what more can I ask for?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I tried to be a "good" "responsible" girl and go to bed at a decent time tonight. I forsook any naps this afternoon and spent 2 hours at the gym -- but here I am, still awake at 2AM. Sigh.
As I refuse to lay in my bed tossing and turning, and yet have a mind too muddled to work on anything thesis-related (my, I'm quite the rationalizer), here's something I came across:
It's the latest pet project from the Right whom I adore so much. For those of you that know me well, you know I'd hardly classify myself as a Michael Moore "fan." Granted, I did begrudgingly like his work on Fahrenheit 9/11 -- if only because I liked the fact he offered a different perspective on the events of the last 4 years besides the sugar-coated messages the media (and current Administration) enjoy feeding the American public.
And yes, I do support the rights of these documentarians to make a refutation of Moore's latest diatribe -- but there are some items in this "hype" film that give me pause.
First of all, let's examine the "expert" panel that have assembled to contribute. The panelists include former mayor of NYC Ed Koch (who presumably has lots of time to talk after retiring his stint on The People's Court); that wacky senator from home, Zell Miller (God only knows what he'll say next, thanks to his "conscience of a conservative Democrat"); reporters from Fox News ("fair and balanced" toward the direction of the Right); and my personal favorite, Ann Coulter (she of the fair hair and whacked out political views). Interesting choices, there.
The book that the film is based on includes several elements to address the "tainted truths" of Moore's film, while also containing a "diet suggestion for Michael Moore." What is up with Republicans attacking Moore about his weight? It's like they're in elementary school and have to take up the role of the bully to get their points across. Fine -- disagree with the guy, but you don't haveta resort to petty name calling.
But -- let's get to the actual preview of FahrenHYPE 9/11 itself:
"One Controversial Film Deserves Another." Good ol' Zell saying, "here we have [Moore] saying that the President has spread misery throughout the world -- C'mon!" Oh, and then we have various pundits stating that the Iraq war was not about oil -- with a quick cutaway shot to a stack of grenade crates.
Funny, there's no mention of WMD or Osama anywhere to be found within the 3-minute preview.
And it's funny (in that tasty ironic type of way), watching these people talk about the "huge threats" my country is now in, with Coulter confidently stating that our military has the abilities to "strategically" fight a war that does not target innocent civilians -- especially since I can see their delusion even as they're talking about the delusions they accuse Moore of.
That said, I would still be interested in watching this film -- but I don't know if I'll ever get the opportunity. It's coming straight to video, and I can't rationalize spending 20 bucks of my own money in order to watch deluded people rant about a leader who has put my country's reputation down the tube.
If I want that, I can just turn on CNN or MSNBC.
|
|
|
|
|
Today someone told me that I have an ability to "blend in" with the majority of the student population at school. That's probably due to my tendency to wear teeshirts and jeans whenever I'm not teaching. That, and my ability to look like I'm barely out of high school.
I'm still waiting for that time when I find it a compliment to be thought of as younger.
|
|
|
|
|
Today in an instructor's meeting we talked about Ethics. Here's an ethical dilemma for you:
Fla. Court Nixes Law Keeping Woman Alive
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. - Dealing a defeat to Gov. Jeb Bush, the Florida Supreme Court (news - web sites) on Thursday struck down a law that was rushed through the Legislature last fall to keep a severely brain-damaged woman hooked to a feeding tube.
The seven-member court unanimously said Bush and lawmakers improperly tried to pull an end run around the court system in the case of Terri Schiavo, who has been at the center of a long and bitter right-to-die dispute that pits her husband against his in-laws.
As early as 2000, lower courts had ruled that Michael Schiavo could have his wife's feeding tube removed. But last October, the Legislature passed "Terri's Law" to override the courts, and Bush quickly invoked it to order the tube reinserted, six days after it had been withdrawn.
George Felos, Michael Schiavo's attorney, said no attempt to remove the tube would be made until the ruling becomes final. That could be weeks if Bush's attorneys asks the court for a rehearing.
Felos said Michael Schiavo was happy with the ruling and is determined to carry out his wife's wishes.
"Mr. Schiavo made a promise to his wife like many of us do," Felos said. "He promised he would not keep her alive artificially and he's going to keep his promise."
Thursday's ruling gives the governor 10 days to ask for a rehearing, and an attorney for Bush said he may appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites). Either action could stop, at least temporarily, any attempt to remove the tube.
Bush disagreed with the outcome.
"I'm disappointed for the moral reasons of the taking of innocent life without having — I don't think — a full hearing on the facts of what her intent was," the governor said. He noted that it can take the courts 20 or 25 years to review death sentences.
What do you think? I don't think I'd want someone to starve to death, just because I think that's a pretty inhumane way to die -- but I don't think someone who didn't want to be kept artificially living should be forced to stay alive, either. It's a tricky situation.
Ultimately I think it's a personal decision -- and shouldn't be part of a party platform for any politician or religious group.
|
|
|
|
|
Who's up for a road trip in February?
Okay, maybe not a road trip per se (the Trans Canada is pretty scary when it's not covered in snow/ice), but I'm seriously thinking about heading out West for the first annual Canadian blogging conference, Northern Voice.
It's going to be held in Vancouver (on the campus of UBC) on February 19, 2005.
We've got a fairly extensive blogging community here in Saskatoon, so I think we should have a good contingent of folks representing our fair province. I'm sure we can grab up some cheap Westjet tickets, and the date falls right at the tail end of Reading Week. And thanks to my Vancouver connection, there's even some reasonably "student priced" accomodations downtown.
So, whatta say? Oh, did I mention that I'm hoping to present a discussion while I'm there? I want to tie in blogging with rhetoric -- I'm still mulling ideas over in my head, but I think the paper I want to present is going to be pretty keen (and interesting!).
Go mark your calendars or listen to this interview. I'm sure to bug some of you in person about this, whenever I see you next.
It shouldn't take much convincing to travel out of Saskatchewan in the middle of February!
|
|
|
|
|
Tonight I checked out Garden State with Todd. Yes, yes, I originally went for superficial reasons (mainly my affinity for him) -- but I left the theatre really impacted by what I saw. In fact, I think this film is going up there next to Lost in Translation for me ... which is no small feat.
It's not what I would call a comedy or drama or that awful term "dramedy" -- and as cliched as I'm probably sounding about now, I would position this movie toward most twenty-somethings out there. It deeply resounded for me, at least.
Here's one bit of dialogue to illustrate what I mean:
Andrew Largeman: You know that point in your life when you realize that the house that you grew up in isn't really your home anymore? All of the sudden even though you have some place where you can put your stuff that idea of home is gone.
Sam: I still feel at home in my house.
Andrew Largeman: You'll see when you move out it just sort of happens one day one day and it's just gone. And you can never get it back. It's like you get homesick for a place that doesn't exist. I mean it's like this rite of passage, you know. You won't have this feeling again until you create a new idea of home for yourself, you know, for you kids, for the family you start, it's like a cycle or something. I miss the idea of it. Maybe that's all family really is. A group of people who miss the same imaginary place. I know exactly what he means. Exactly.
I feel that way everytime I go "home." Nowadays I'm divided between two completely different places (in more ways than just location), which makes me feel not very whole anymore -- which in turn makes me feel homesick all over again. I'm not sure there are words to describe it.
Anyway, I left the movie feeling really melancholy. Not because the film itself was depressing, but that I could understand it. There have been times in my life where I've settled for an ellipses when I really needed a different punctuation mark.
Go see for yourself.
EDIT: Okay, I sound miserable. I'm not. (And yes, I do tend toward the hyperbole.) Just leave this post knowing this movie is GREAT. The soundtrack is phenomenal, so if anything -- just go and close your eyes and enjoy the music, for crying out loud.
And yes, my adoration for ZB has quadrupled. That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
Cat Stevens a terrorist?!
According to some "watchlists," anyway. Who knew?
|
|
|
|
|
| Insomnia Dana Gioia
Now you hear what the house has to say. Pipes clanking, water running in the dark, the mortgaged walls shifting in discomfort, and voices mounting in an endless drone of small complaints like the sounds of a family that year by year you've learned how to ignore.
But now you must listen to the things you own, all that you've worked for these past years, the murmur of property, of things in disrepair, the moving parts about to come undone, and twisting in the sheets remember all the faces you could not bring yourself to love.
How many voices have escaped you until now, the venting furnace, the floorboards underfoot, the steady accusations of the clock numbering the minutes no one will mark. The terrible clarity this moment brings, the useless insight, the unbroken dark.
|
|
|
|
| Lopsided View |
 Lopsided View Originally uploaded by Becky B..
I just started using Flickr -- it's a neat little program to help you share pictures.
This one I took last year when I went out to Ang's grandparents' farm. |
|
|
|
|
Kerry's "Top 10 Bush Tax Proposals" are:
10. No estate tax for families with at least two U.S. presidents.
9. W-2 Form is now Dubya-2 Form.
8. Under the simplified tax code, your refund check goes directly to Halliburton.
7. The reduced earned income tax credit is so unfair, it just makes me want to tear out my lustrous, finely groomed hair.
6. Attorney General (John) Ashcroft gets to write off the entire U.S. Constitution.
5. Texas Rangers can take a business loss for trading Sammy Sosa.
4. Eliminate all income taxes; just ask Teresa (Heinz Kerry) to cover the whole damn thing.
3. Cheney can claim Bush as a dependent.
2. Hundred-dollar penalty if you pronounce it "nuclear" instead of "nucular."
1. George W. Bush gets a deduction for mortgaging our entire future.
|
|
|
|
|
So today Bush addressed the UN and defended our attack on Iraq.
I've watched snippets of his speech, plus read various reports on what he said. It's interesting to see how this issue is shaping the election and the two candidates. Bush stands firmly behind his decision to invade a country on faulty intelligence, and is determined to paint Kerry as indecisive in his perspective on the Iraq war. Kerry, for his part, is finally saying something about his opinion on the current quagmire -- and is at least hinting at some ideas for resolving that tricky situation.
Who would I rather have as my leader? A man who refuses to acknowledge any fault in his decision making, and would rather stand by his faulty decisions -- at the high cost of human life and huge deficits? Or would I rather have a leader who voted to give the President authority to go to war, trusting that this leader would not abuse this power?
The republicians are trying to paint Bush as a man of resolve. The more they paint him in this light, the more resolved I am that he not have another 4 years in office.
More hostages beheaded in Iraq. Sigh.
|
|
|
|
|
Suddenly, I have the day to myself.
I had thought I'd be stuck at school all day working and in class -- but I don't have to now, which means I have the whole day to myself. Exciting! Hopefully I'll be able to add to those two paragraphs of mine.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I've officially started the dreaded thesis project. The most intimidating thing for me (out of many things, admittedly) is the actual starting of it. The blank page is one scary creature.
 | | | | | |