| If you possess the XY chromosome, you can skip over this post. |
What is with commercials dealing with women and their periods?!
(okay, I warned you guys out there not to read this post)
I'm watching one of my guilty pleasures tonight when I see a commercial for "having a 'happy' period" -- and I nearly threw something across the room at the TV screen.
The National Post has a really good article on the recent ad campaign, along with the typical stigma that is maintained about the whole menstruation cycle: Ladies, are you having a happy period? The nice people at Proctor & Gamble, the producer of Always pads, really really want you to. That's why they've launched a "Have a happy period" campaign, complete with a "happy period" manifesto. Written in pale-blue script, the directive reads like a wonky hybrid of the Desiderata and The Declaration of Independence. "This is the time of month that chocolate was created for," it begins. "This is the time when no toenail should go unpolished. When the gym will get along just fine without you. This is the time when, if something is even slightly annoying, the world should know about it. And if you feel like crying, there is no inappropriate time or place. It's your period. You have the right to make it the best period it can possibly be. And we're here to help."
And how does P&G, the dominant manufacturer of disposable feminine-hygiene products, including Tampax, propose to "help"? Will it finally produce goods that don't include any dioxins, the "class A" carcinogen found in trace amounts in tampons, sanitary pads, panty liners and diapers? Is it working to invent a reusable -- but not yucky -- menstruation product that doesn't add to landfill overload? Does it plan to eliminate chemical scents and "deodorizers" that can cause rashes, allergic reactions and yeast infections when they upset the vagina's pH balance? Er, no. Its idea of "help" is "empowering" women with billboards telling them to "Put yourself on a pedestal. Buy some heels." Expect more of it. The campaign, which spans print, TV and the Internet, will run through 2006. Puh-leaze.
I suppose it's only "natural" for advertising campaigns to progress from encouraging women to be ashamed of this natural process to trivializing it to the point of ridiculousness. Don't forget those incredibly stupid commercials that make menstruation a joke. Remember that tampon commercial where the couple is in a canoe, and it springs a leak? How will they plug it, you ask? Why, with a tampon, of course! And then there's the commercials where tampons are confused for candy, etc.
The article concludes by saying: It's not surprising the industry wants to perpetuate the notion that menstruation is private and embarrassing, not to be discussed. Or that it wants to put a happy face on it. The press kit for the "Have a happy period" campaign notes that there's Internet access so "women can appreciate and digest the message privately." This is consistent with Kotex offering silly "Ssshhh! Quietest pouch!" packaging, as if being heard opening it would be cause for shame. It's not. What is shameful is an industry that profits so richly from women's blood telling women to be happy about it. You don't even have to be on your period to be more than slightly annoyed about that. Exactly. (read the rest of the article here)
This is one of my favorite rants -- society's twisted perspective on menstruation. I don't understand why there are "sanitary" napkins for women, implying that this is something that requires us to be cleansed in some way. Ironically, most of the "feminine hygenine" products that are pushed over the counter at us are items that end up hurting us more than helping.
I also don't understand why this process isn't a special rite-of-passage for women to celebrate -- instead it's something that is typically dreaded and passed over as just another burden for women to bear and hide away.
This isn't right.
And while I'm ranting, let's bring in some verses from the Bible that have always bothered me on the topic of women, periods, and "uncleanliness."
Leviticus 15 -- 19 " 'When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening. 20 " 'Anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. 21 Whoever touches her bed must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. 22 Whoever touches anything she sits on must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. 23 Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, he will be unclean till evening. 24 " 'If a man lies with her and her monthly flow touches him, he will be unclean for seven days; any bed he lies on will be unclean. 25 " 'When a woman has a discharge of blood for many days at a time other than her monthly period or has a discharge that continues beyond her period, she will be unclean as long as she has the discharge, just as in the days of her period. 26 Any bed she lies on while her discharge continues will be unclean, as is her bed during her monthly period, and anything she sits on will be unclean, as during her period. 27 Whoever touches them will be unclean; he must wash his clothes and bathe with water, and he will be unclean till evening. 28 " 'When she is cleansed from her discharge, she must count off seven days, and after that she will be ceremonially clean. 29 On the eighth day she must take two doves or two young pigeons and bring them to the priest at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting. 30 The priest is to sacrifice one for a sin offering and the other for a burnt offering. In this way he will make atonement for her before the LORD for the uncleanness of her discharge. I particularly like the recurrent "unclean" images and the fact that women were required to offer sin and burnt offerings each month in atonement. Maybe the contemporary misperceptions on menstruation found their roots in ancient Judeo-Christian ethics?
And then, there's this passage:
Leviticus 12 --1 The LORD said to Moses, 2 "Say to the Israelites: 'A woman who becomes pregnant and gives birth to a son will be ceremonially unclean for seven days, just as she is unclean during her monthly period. 3 On the eighth day the boy is to be circumcised. 4 Then the woman must wait thirty-three days to be purified from her bleeding. She must not touch anything sacred or go to the sanctuary until the days of her purification are over. 5 If she gives birth to a daughter, for two weeks the woman will be unclean, as during her period. Then she must wait sixty-six days to be purified from her bleeding. 6 " 'When the days of her purification for a son or daughter are over, she is to bring to the priest at the entrance to the Tent of Meeting a year-old lamb for a burnt offering and a young pigeon or a dove for a sin offering. 7 He shall offer them before the LORD to make atonement for her, and then she will be ceremonially clean from her flow of blood. " 'These are the regulations for the woman who gives birth to a boy or a girl. 8 If she cannot afford a lamb, she is to bring two doves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. In this way the priest will make atonement for her, and she will be clean.' " |
|
|
|
-
Happy period = Oxy moron (I hate that ad campaign as well).
As for the Leviticus scripture..the only thing I like about that particular passage is that it's old testament. That means Jesus death and ressurection makes all of those regulations completely irrellevant.
I believe they are only in the bible not to peeve women, but to show us all the ridiculous rules and stupidity of trying to earn God's approval. It makes me grateful for all that Jesus death in the New Testament freed us from.
-
Hey Christy, yeah, those passages are from the OT -- but there's still plenty of people that use passages from the same book to prove homosexuality is "an abomination" today. And there's lots of passages in the NT that bother me as well, regarding women.
I just have a hard time reading these passages and then reconciling them as "holy" Scripture or considering them canon. They're far more hurtful than they are helpful.
-
Reading some of these passages of the Bible later in life makes me appreciate the fact I was a bad girl growing up and not being serious in my Catholic education after 7th grade. We didn't really read the Bible in the first place, but some of these passages are awful!
As for the "happy period" ad, gag me! Periods aren't happy! They are an inconvenience. They are annoying. They just aren't happy things! However, I will say when I need to purchase pads for myself or anyone else, I'm not ashamed or embarrassed. If a fact of life, just like other conditions.
-
As a man, I don't find periods to be disgusting, nor do I find commercials, etc. to be offensive.
What I do, however, find offensive is the sheer amount of TV air time that is devoted to advertising these products.
At first, I thought it was a man thing to think that commercials for period products were played more often than most products. Nope, my girlfriend was sure to back me up in telling me that she can't believe how many there are.
I would be willing to bet, that in a study of all advertising on TV by product (not brand product... but... product), "period products" (tampons, pads, etc.) would be among the top three advertised products.
-
Hey Beck,
If you're a fan of Kids in the Hall you should really find the skit by Dave Foley: "I'm the guy. The guy with a good attitude towards menstruation."
That is to say, I also have a good attitude towards menstruation, and I'm glad that you do to.
-
As a woman who is having some reproductive health issues right now, I am tired of the daily reminder that people find periods are a pain in the...
When and if I get a period I am thankful. It means first of all that I'm (for lack of a more tactful phrase) in proper working order, and secondly that if I play my cards right, I might become pregnant this month.
Your period should be a happy time, and we shouldn't have to be reminded of this in a commercial.
If we want to chart strange and unusual commercials that make people uncomfortable, let's study the male reaction to the Errectile Disfunction Medication Advertisements that are EVERYWHERE!!
-
OMFG. While I do enjoy being a woman, and do have a joyful pang of "hey, yay, things are still in working order and I'm not knocked up" every 28 days, I do not need to be giddy about it.
Especially when I'm also suffering cramps, nausea, diahrea, acne, bloating, headaches and mood swings.
In fact, if someone instructed me to eat chocolate and just "be happy" I'd be more inclined to take one of my kicky "new high heels" and REPEATEDLY STAB THEM IN THE FACE WITH IT.
Yes, I have PMS right now. Why do you ask?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Happy period = Oxy moron (I hate that ad campaign as well).
As for the Leviticus scripture..the only thing I like about that particular passage is that it's old testament. That means Jesus death and ressurection makes all of those regulations completely irrellevant.
I believe they are only in the bible not to peeve women, but to show us all the ridiculous rules and stupidity of trying to earn God's approval. It makes me grateful for all that Jesus death in the New Testament freed us from.